Output per hour in Britain is 29% lower than in US and 24% lower than in Germany and France, ONS says
Deep recession and slow recovery has widened Britain's productivity gap with other rich G7 nations to its largest since 1994, according to official figures.
Data from the Office for National Statistics showed that the output per hour from UK workers in 2012 was 2% down on its pre-slump levels in 2007 and 16% below the average of other leading industrialised nations.
The ONS said that output per hour worked in Britain was 29% lower than in the US and 24% lower than in Germany and France. Canada and Italy had slightly higher productivity than the UK and only one G7 nation – Japan – had a worse record.
Britain's gross domestic product is still below its peak reached in 2008 but despite the deepest recession of modern times, the shake-out in the labour market was less severe than in the downturns of the 1980s and 1990s. The combination of weak output and a willingness of workers to accept pay cuts to keep their jobs has resulted in a poor productivity record.
The ONS said that the gap with the rest of the G7 was even wider – 19% – using an alternative measure of productivity, output per worker.
John Philpott, director of The Jobs Economist, said: "The relative improvement in the UK's productivity performance from the mid-1990s to the late 2000s has clearly gone into reverse in an economy reliant on falling real wages, rather than increased output, as the main driver of employment growth. According to the ONS output per hour in 2012 would have been 15 percentage points higher had the pre-recession rate of growth been maintained. Though some of this latter growth may have been 'illusory' in that it was propelled by an unsustainable boom, the UK economy clearly needs in particular a strong resurgence of business investment in order to regain its pre-recession productivity mojo."
The Bank of England is assuming that Britain's productivity will improve as demand recovers, although opinions differ about how much of the shortfall is caused by permanent scarring from the recession.
Howard Archer, chief UK economist at IHS Global Insight, said the ONS's international comparisons made "very uncomfortable reading." He added: "An element of the UK's poor productivity performance does appear to have been companies' willingness to hold on to workers, particularly when the workers are skilled or experienced. There have also been reports that some companies employed more people, or at least retained workers, as they found winning and delivering work more resource-intensive in an environment of persistently weak demand."